How a Healthcare Platform Achieved 67% Higher Patient Satisfaction Through Accessibility Testing
KiwiQATable of Contents
The medical care industry had adopted better patient care technology before covid hit. The COVID-19 pandemic has massively accelerated the adoption of technologies, and since then, the use of digital tools in healthcare has been steadily improving each year. The reports by EY said 83% of doctors said they feel more comfortable when using digital health technologies. In addition, 67% of the healthcare team is also planning to use innovative tools to allow better patient care & effective operation. In the current virtual age, healthcare providers are recognizing the necessity of enhancing patient experience through web accessibility testing services.
Digital accessibility in the healthcare sector is a necessary aspect of offering equal access to medical care services. Currently, the healthcare accessibility testing services ensure that their sites are accessible for all patients regardless of their abilities. Medical sites or applications are built to be accessible for every user, including users with any disability. Digital accessibility in the healthcare landscape includes accessible content that is easy to navigate.
Healthcare providers must ensure that their tools fulfill all regulatory compliance requirements. By prioritizing all these features, a healthcare accessibility testing company can craft a better, more inclusive environment. Conducting accessibility in the healthcare sector is necessary to ensure that every user can swiftly access the app.
Following this practice aligns with ethical standards & and legal demands. Here in this blog, we have shared the challenges in the healthcare sector and the demand for accessibility testing to navigate the gaps. Check how you can achieve 67% of patient satisfaction with accessibility testing.
The medical care landscape is a comprehensive digital solution designed to support telehealth consultation, appointment scheduling, and a secure patient portal. It allows patients to book virtual as well as personal visits, smooth communication with healthcare providers, and manage prescriptions.
The accessibility testing consultancy aims to streamline healthcare delivery while minimizing administrative burdens for providers. The user base in the healthcare sector is diverse, including tech-savvy adults, elderly patients, and individuals with visual or motor impairments. Most of the users rely on the platform during crucial health issues.
To navigate the level of digital literacy and age-related challenges, the digital accessibility testing company highlights the necessity of inclusive design, for elder users and patients with visual impairments, small fonts, complicated navigation, and limited screen-reader compatibility can cause barriers. Any errors in accessibility directly hamper patient confidence and their engagement.
The platform’s digital usability caused a fall in patient satisfaction levels. Patients found it challenging to accomplish crucial tasks like scheduling appointments or accessing test results due to complicated navigation, inconsistent layouts, and ambiguous call-to-action features. Frustration got worse with slow page loads and confusing routines, particularly when there were urgent care needs.
First-time users and elderly patients reported feeling overburdened, which resulted in sessions being abandoned and a decline in platform trust. These usability problems had a negative effect on post-visit surveys and app store evaluations, and they also negatively affected patient engagement and the relationships between patients and providers.
Patients with disabilities consistently expressed dissatisfaction with the platform’s accessibility barriers. For example, visually impaired users reported poor screen-reader compatibility, missing alt text, and low color contrast that made content difficult to perceive; patients with motor impairments encountered difficulties due to small clickable elements and limited keyboard navigation; and hearing-impaired users reported the absence of captions or transcripts for educational content and video consultations. These gaps made patients feel excluded and undervalued, which reduced their capacity to independently manage healthcare tasks and negatively impacted their overall experience.
Concerns about the platform’s compliance with well-known accessibility guidelines like WCAG, ADA, and Section 508 were becoming more prevalent. The organization was subject to legal and regulatory concerns, such as possible complaints or penalties, due to inconsistent adherence to these principles.
The problem was made worse by missing accessibility documentation, inadequate audits, and a lack of continuous monitoring. Beyond the legal ramifications, the organization’s dedication to inclusive care was compromised by non-compliance. It became essential to address these principles in order to guarantee fair access, lower risk, and foster patient trust in addition to meeting legal obligations.
Accessibility was recognized by leadership as a strategic issue as opposed to a compliance afterthought. Dedicated budgets were approved by executives, and product roadmaps included accessibility objectives. QA, UX, development, and compliance were among the cross-functional teams that collaborated to integrate inclusive design and testing techniques.
To take advantage of specialized knowledge and scalable testing skills, outside assistance from accessibility testing companies in India was also taken into consideration. This change assured long-term dedication to providing an inclusive, patient-centered digital healthcare experience, decreased silos, and established shared ownership.
To guarantee methodical and visible improvements, a structured accessibility testing approach was implemented. The accessibility testing agency used a staged strategy, starting with a thorough accessibility audit to find any holes on mobile and web platforms. This audit integrated manual assessments, such as contrast analysis, keyboard navigation tests, and screen-reader testing, with automated scans. Results were recorded and ranked according to regulatory risk, user impact, and severity.
Targeted accessibility testing, healthcare incorporated into current QA processes, was the main focus of the second phase. In order to guarantee consistent validation throughout every release cycle, test cases were mapped to WCAG success criteria. Early resolution was made possible by collaboration with the UX and development teams, which decreased rework and sped up repairs. This stage was supported by accessibility testing firms in India, who offered comprehensive compliance reports, real-user simulations, and scalable testing resources.
Remedial action and ongoing improvement were prioritized in the last stage of Healthcare accessibility testing. To monitor success, certain key performance indicators (KPIs) were established, such as increases in patient satisfaction scores, decreases in the stack of accessibility issues, and overall compliance scores. Accountability and transparency were guaranteed by frequent reviews. By adhering to this staged strategy, the company integrated inclusivity into the product lifecycle and transitioned from reactive repairs to proactive accessibility assurance.
Also Read : Manual Accessibility Testing: A Comprehensive Guide
☢ Axe DevTools – To swiftly find WCAG issues throughout the platform, automated accessibility testing was conducted using Axe DevTools. Early in the development process, it assisted in identifying problems, including missing alt text, incorrect ARIA labels, color contrast issues, and semantic HTML flaws.
☢ NVDA/JAWS – Real-world experiences for visually impaired people were validated using NVDA and JAWS screen readers. To guarantee seamless, screen-reader-friendly interactions, testing concentrated on navigation flow, form labels, announcements, and content readability.
☢ BrowserStack with screen readers – Using built-in screen readers, BrowserStack made cross-browser and cross-device accessibility testing possible. It reduced environment-specific usability problems by ensuring consistent accessible behavior across various operating systems, browsers, and assistive technologies.
☢ Manual keyboard testing – All platform functions were verified to be mouse-inaccessible through manual keyboard testing. Logical tab order, focus visibility, keyboard shortcuts, and the capacity to finish crucial tasks solely with keyboard inputs were all verified by testers.
☢ User testing with real patients with disabilities- Usability testing involved actual patients with visual, motor, and cognitive limitations. Their opinions identified real-world problems, verified solutions, and guaranteed that accessibility enhancements actually improved the patient experience.
✦ Automated audits for high-traffic pages- On popular pages, including login, appointment scheduling, and patient dashboards, automated accessibility checks were carried out. By promptly identifying WCAG problems, including missing labels, contrast failures, and structural flaws, these audits made it possible to prioritize and fix important accessibility gaps more quickly.
✦ Manual tests for appointment forms, chatbots, and dashboards- Manual testing concentrated on intricate user interactions, such as patient dashboards, chatbots, and appointment forms. To make sure people with disabilities could finish tasks on their own, testers assessed keyboard navigation, screen-reader flow, error messages, and form validation.
✦ Mobile accessibility checks- Healthtech accessibility solutions testing for mobile confirmed usability on both iOS and Android devices. Screen-reader support, touch target sizes, gesture options, orientation management, and readability were all tested to make sure mobile healthcare consumers had a reliable and accessible experience.
✦ Color contrast and font-size testing- Accessibility testing healthcare platforms for font size and color contrast ensured that the text complied with WCAG readability requirements. In order to assist people with low vision and age-related visual difficulties, designers verified contrast ratios, scalable typefaces, and responsive layouts.
✦ Improved keyboard navigation and focus indicators- By providing clear focus indications, enabling skip links, and adjusting tab order, keyboard navigation was improved. These enhancements improved usability for people with mobility impairments and screen readers by enabling users to browse all functions without a mouse.
✦ Added proper ARIA labels and semantic HTML- Semantic HTML elements and appropriate ARIA labels were added to enhance assistive technology compatibility. Better content organization, more accurate screen-reader announcements, and easier navigation between forms, menus, and interactive elements were all made possible by this.
✦ Enhanced contrast ratios and scalable text- Text was made completely scalable without disrupting layouts, and contrast ratios were raised. These modifications enhanced readability across devices and lighting situations for older patients and people with limited vision.
✦ Simplified forms with assistive hints- By eliminating unnecessary fields, enhancing error warnings, and including helpful recommendations, forms were made simpler. Users were able to confidently complete forms because of clear instructions and inline advice, which decreased errors and abandonment rates.
In just three months, organized accessibility improvements resulted in a 67% increase in patient satisfaction levels. Positive post-visit surveys and app evaluations resulted from patients’ increased self-assurance while utilizing the platform on their own.
Following the implementation of critical fixes, support tickets pertaining to usability and accessibility decreased by 40%. The need for help was decreased via improved screen-reader compatibility, cleaner forms, and keyboard navigation. This decrease demonstrated how proactive accessibility testing services may greatly increase platform effectiveness.
Following accessibility testing services, retention rates were significantly higher for elderly and visually challenged patients. Routine chores were made easier with better contrast, streamlined procedures, and screen-reader-friendly layouts.
Systematic audits, testing, and remediation significantly increased the platform’s WCAG 2.1 AA compliance score from 68% to 96%. Organizational credibility was enhanced, and legal and regulatory concerns were decreased via consistent adherence to accessibility requirements. Compliance was maintained throughout new versions thanks to regular reviews and continuing accessibility testing services.
A significant change towards patient independence was evident in this feedback. Users, particularly senior patients, were able to complete bookings independently because of accessible form validation, clear labels, and streamlined appointment sequences.
Smoother screen-reader compatibility was opted for by visually challenged patients as a significant improvement. Accurate announcements and effective interactions were guaranteed by appropriate ARIA labels, semantic HTML, and logical navigation.
After the platform’s accessibility was improved, underserved patient groups showed increased trust and loyalty. Emotional connections with the medical professional were reinforced when they felt included and supported.
Also Read : Enhancing Logistics & Transportation with Accessibility and Performance Testing
Patients’ perceptions and usage of digital healthcare platforms are directly impacted by accessibility. Users express more happiness, feel more confident, and finish jobs more quickly when accessibility is given priority. All users, not only those with disabilities, benefit from inclusive design in terms of overall usability.
While manual testing reveals actual usability problems, automated tools swiftly discover common accessibility concerns. Combining the two methods guarantees improved alignment with real-world patient interactions across various assistive devices, more accuracy, and wider coverage.
Testing with actual disabled users offers insights that are not possible with tools alone. Their input identifies real-world obstacles, assesses solutions, and guarantees that accessibility upgrades actually improve patient autonomy and experience.
Platforms that are accessible show a strong dedication to providing inclusive care. Long-term engagement, brand trust, and loyalty are all strengthened when patients feel appreciated and helped.
A misleading perception of accessibility is produced by relying only on automated tools. Human evaluation is necessary for many usability difficulties. Hiring accessibility QA for healthcare apps facilitates the identification of intricate, practical issues that go beyond automated scan findings.
When accessibility is neglected during design, it becomes expensive and ineffective to address problems later. Incorporating designers and an accessibility testing consultancy early on guarantees that inclusive design principles are ingrained from the first.
Delaying accessibility changes until the very end results in insufficient repair. Consistent, inclusive user experiences are produced, rework is decreased, and compliance is increased when accessibility is integrated throughout the development process.
In conclusion, incorporating Digital accessibility for healthcare isn’t a regulatory necessity but a practical decision. Accessibility testing ensures inclusivity and gives access to use the app to a wide user base. Accessibility testing not only improves patient satisfaction but also leaves a long-lasting impact. If you also want to enhance accessibility in your platform, talk with the accessibility testing company and design a strategy to achieve real outcomes.
Join the like-minded community & get the latest updates and insights on software testing technological transformation around the globe. Don't miss out.
